Among the many rule changes in the NFL, the most discussed one has been about the new spot on kickoffs.
By putting the kicking tee on the 35-yard line as opposed to the 30, the rule change has resulted in more touchbacks. A downside to this rule change, as greatly discussed, has been that it has decreased the value of a kick returner.
In tonight's San Diego-Dallas exhibition game, however, there was another rule change that caught my attention.
With 12:47 left in the fourth quarter and the Chargers leading 17-7, the Cowboys had the ball on San Diego's 23-yard line. On third-and-1, Phillip Tanner ran 23 yards for a touchdown -- after his helmet got removed from his head by a defender.
Due to a rule change, stating that a runner is ruled down once his helmet is removed, the touchdown didn't count.
Tanner would have had his touchdown called back anyway because the Cowboys committed a five-yard illegal shift penalty. However, the play still caught my attention.
It caught my attention because it shows an unfair advantage that has been created as a result of the rule change. Now, a defender can essentially tackle an opponent with the mere act of taking off his helmet.
I am not arguing against the rule change. Obviously, players' safety is an important issue, and playing without a helmet is definitely unsafe.
And yanking a player's helmet by the facemask is still illegal.
However, it's a little unfair that a defender can tackle an opponent by yanking off his helmet via, for example, one of the earholes. It's something the NFL should look into.
Sunday, August 21, 2011
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment